<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chinese Negotiation &#187; Balance of Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/tag/balance-of-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com</link>
	<description>Negotiate in China more effectively and successfully</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:25:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Guanxi in Chinese Negotiation: Of Alpha Dogs and Leg Humpers</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2012/01/guanxi-in-chinese-negotiation-of-alpha-dogs-and-leg-humpers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2012/01/guanxi-in-chinese-negotiation-of-alpha-dogs-and-leg-humpers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hupert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Americans Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Know Your Counter-Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiating styles in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese negotiating behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guanxi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-China negotiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chinese negotiators like building relationships as part of the deal-making process, but they aren’t typically big fans of the type of even-split, 50-50 partnerships that Westerners favor.  Traditional Chinese negotiators are more comfortable with a clear hierarchy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chinese negotiating counterparties like building relationships as part of the deal-making process, but they aren’t usually big fans of the type of even-split, 50-50 partnerships that Westerners favor.  Traditional Chinese negotiators are more comfortable with a clear hierarchy.  On one hand, they can be the alpha male who sets the rules and the pace – leveraging on their China knowledge and local contacts.  But they are also comfortable elevating you to god-like leader status while they fawn and give face – and don’t contribute much else.<br />
<br />The only role that you aren’t likely to see a traditionally Chinese counterparty take on is the one you want – an equal partnership.  If that’s what you are after, you had better plan on spending a lot of time searching out the right counterparty, and you’ll still have to negotiate very explicitly and thoroughly from the very first meeting.</p>
<ol>
<strong>Guanxi Type 1:  Your new best friend</strong><br />
• Some Chinese counter-parties will use flattery, friendship and social events to build a cordial relationship.<br />
• This is a ‘sales-type’ approach.  He is selling his services to you, and he wants a salary or expects you to buy goods or services from his firm.<br />
• Good news – they may be taking the initiative to build a strong, healthy, win-win relationship.<br />
• Bad news – they may be pressuring you to reciprocate with better deal terms, IP, or relaxed QC/compliance requirements.  He thinks his flattery and submissive behavior is a valuable service and expects compensation.<br />
• <em>More bad news</em> – This scenario often leads to a <a href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/05/chinese-tactics-the-balance-of-power/">balance of power shift</a>. Once he has your money, technology and know-how, your status becomes somewhat less god-like.<br />
• <em>Even worse news</em> –  Those pretty young girls half your age who laugh at your jokes and think that you are so wonderful… yeah, they are in this category.  Sorry, but someone had to tell you.  </ol>
<ol>
<strong>Guanxi Type 2:  Your guide, teacher &#8211; and boss?</strong><br />
• Chinese businessmen will offer to help you through their connections, insider knowledge and guanxi with suppliers and regulators.<br />
• Consultative approach.  They are offering to help you solve specific problems and clear away existing bottlenecks.<br />
• <em>Good news</em> – They may really know what they are doing and can facilitate your business.<br />
• <em>Bad news</em> – They feel that they are in charge of the new partnership.<br />
• <em>More bad news </em>– You probably need them more than they need you, so you are negotiating from a position of weakness. </ol>
<p>Beware of your American impulses to treat every relationship as an equitable, just, “we’re all in this together” 50-50 partnership.  It could be taken as a submissive gesture – which can invite aggressive, value-grabbing behavior.  </p>
<p>===========<br />
<em>Stay Connected to <a href="http://www.chinasolved.com/">ChinaSolved</a> / <a href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/">ChineseNegotiation.com</a>:</em><br />
<!-- Place this tag where you want the +1 button to render --></p>
<p><!-- Place this render call where appropriate --><br />
<script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
   (function() {     var po = document.createElement('script'); po.type = 'text/javascript'; po.async = true;     po.src = 'https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js';     var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s);   })();
// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<div class="fb-like-box" data-href="https://www.facebook.com/pages/ChinaSolved/293904690655157" data-width="292" data-show-faces="false" data-stream="false" data-header="true"></div>
<p><em>ChineseNegotiation.com and ChinaSolved.com invite you to participate the <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups/China-Solved-1392417?gid=1392417&amp;trk=hb_side_g">ChinaSolved linkedin group</a>.</em></p>
<p><em>Twitter: @chinasolved VPN required in China.</em><br />
Email at <a href="http://www.chinasolved.com/chinasolved@gmail.com">chinasolved@gmail.com </a></p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chinesenegotiation.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fguanxi-in-chinese-negotiation-of-alpha-dogs-and-leg-humpers%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2012/01/guanxi-in-chinese-negotiation-of-alpha-dogs-and-leg-humpers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad Apple in the China Barrel</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2012/01/bad-apple-in-the-china-barrel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2012/01/bad-apple-in-the-china-barrel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hupert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Americans Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxconn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Foxconn is a B2B outsourcer and doesn’t need a consumer-friendly brand image, but Apple can’t continue using the reverse Nuremberg defense, “it’s not our fault – we are just giving orders”. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple Inc. has been grabbing all the wrong headlines lately, and the <em>NYTimes</em> piece <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/business/apple-america-and-a-squeezed-middle-class.html?_r=2&amp;ref=charlesduhigg&amp;pagewanted=all">How the U.S. Lost Out on iPhone Work</a> and the <em>BusinessInsider.com</em> <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/you-simply-must-read-this-article-that-explains-why-apple-makes-iphones-in-china-and-why-the-us-is-screwed-2012-1">commentary</a> summarize one part of the problem. Apple isn’t the first company to build corporate strategy around supply chain considerations – it’s been a mainstay of Taiwan’s very successful business planning ever since the mid-1990s. But outsourcing has always been a controversial strategy for US companies, as demonstrated by the auto industry when it started shuttering Detroit factories in the 70s in favor of cheaper Mexican labor – and ended up enabling its own biggest competitors like Toyota and Datsun (predecessor to Nissan).</p>
<p>There are three problems with Apple’s corporate strategy, and the damage being done to its reputation is only the first to manifest. Apple has gone from being the <em>corporate underdog who made good</em> to the poster child for Evil Inc. remarkably quickly &#8211; largely due to the management policies of its Taiwanese OEM partner Foxconn (and its parent Hon Hai). Foxconn is a B2B outsourcer and doesn’t need a consumer-friendly brand image, but Apple can’t continue using the reverse Nuremberg defense, “it’s not our fault – we are just giving orders”. We all know how the products are made.<br />
<br />But I’ll let the PR pros weigh in on the benefits and costs of being an evil corporate monster. It hasn’t hurt Apple’s sales, and plenty of other companies and industries sell great products while behaving beastly to their workers and suppliers.</p>
<p>Apple does, however, have two other problems that will eventually pose a greater threat to its bottom line.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">1. It is way too exposed to supply chain risk.  We’ve seen this before, and it doesn’t end well. Apple has given all the power to its suppliers but retained all the profit for itself. Its designs are in the hands of an engineering team it controls only indirectly. While Taiwanese OEM firms have a good reputation and track record for protecting their client’s intellectual property, Apple is giving up an important competitive competency by outsourcing it’s complete production cycle to a small group of companies that it doesn’t control. Foxconn is in a very powerful negotiating position, and <a href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/05/chinese-tactics-the-balance-of-power">it may not be satisfied with razor thin margins forever</a> .</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">2. Apple is equally exposed to negotiating risk with China – and that may end up being even more dangerous. Beijing giveth, and Beijing retains the right to take away. Right now the considerable power of the Chinese government is flowing Apple’s way, making it easy for Foxconn to do business. But that can change without warning – as it has for so many in the past. If Apple finds itself out of favor with Beijing policy makers, its supply chain is vulnerable to the Chinese bureaucracy. The same is true if a Chinese competitor finds itself in possession of Apple’s proprietary technology. Right now China’s flexibility and ability to mobilize resources is drawing Apple in. China can be famously rigid and immobile when it wants to be.</p>
<p>All China has to do is find Apple (or its suppliers) guilty of violating PRC law – which is almost certainly happening &#8211; to shut down Foxconn production for a couple of days. Apple’s share price will tank, and management will find itself in a very weak negotiating position.  Beijing probably won’t, unless it stands to gain something – like technology or customers.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Background articles on<strong><em> BusinessInsider.com</em></strong>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/you-simply-must-read-this-article-that-explains-why-apple-makes-iphones-in-china-and-why-the-us-is-screwed-2012-1#ixzz1kEUMhyfX">This Article Explains Why Apple Makes iPhones In China And Why The US Is Screwed<br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/steve-jobs-new-iphone-screen-2012-1#ixzz1kEUFL3uV http://www.businessinsider.com/steve-jobs-new-iphone-screen-2012-1">Steve Jobs Freaked Out A Month Before First iPhone Was Released And Demanded A New Screen<br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-child-labor-2012-1#ixzz1kCeE8EYw http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-child-labor-2012-1">Your iPhone Was Built, In Part, By 13 Year-Olds Working 16 Hours A Day For 70 Cents An Hour</a><br />
===========<br />
<em>Stay Connected to <a href="http://www.chinasolved.com/">ChinaSolved</a> / <a href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/">ChineseNegotiation.com</a>:</em><br />
<!-- Place this tag where you want the +1 button to render --></p>
<p><!-- Place this render call where appropriate --><br />
<script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
     (function() {     var po = document.createElement('script'); po.type = 'text/javascript'; po.async = true;     po.src = 'https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js';     var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s);   })();
// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<div class="fb-like-box" data-href="https://www.facebook.com/pages/ChinaSolved/293904690655157" data-width="292" data-show-faces="false" data-stream="false" data-header="true"></div>
<p><em>ChineseNegotiation.com and ChinaSolved.com invite you to participate the <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups/China-Solved-1392417?gid=1392417&amp;trk=hb_side_g">ChinaSolved linkedin group</a>.</em></p>
<p><em>Twitter: @chinasolved VPN required in China.</em><br />
Email at <a href="http://www.chinasolved.com/chinasolved@gmail.com">chinasolved@gmail.com </a></p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chinesenegotiation.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fbad-apple-in-the-china-barrel%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2012/01/bad-apple-in-the-china-barrel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What can you do for me tomorrow?</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2012/01/what-can-you-do-for-me-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2012/01/what-can-you-do-for-me-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hupert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Americans Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Negotiating Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiating styles in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese negotiating behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiating tactic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-China negotiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American dealmakers pressure a counterparty by asking, “What have you done for me lately?”   Chinese dealmakers say, “What can you do for me tomorrow?"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>American dealmakers pressure a counterparty by asking, “What have you done for me lately?”   Chinese dealmakers say, “What can you do for me tomorrow?</em>”</p>
<p>Chinese and American negotiators have differing views towards opportunity and sunk costs. Americans spend time, money and energy vetting deals and counterparties at the start of a negotiation, so once they decide on an investment they stay committed for as long as it makes economic sense. Abandoning one deal to search for another usually involves a significant loss – particularly when they are far from home. Chinese negotiators, however, spend the early phase of a deal focusing on relationship-building and learning about technology and business models. Until recently, they have invested relatively little in the way of cash – often putting up non-cash assets like production capacity, land, staff, and non-tangibles like distribution channels, connections and know-how. If they pull out of an agreement the opportunity costs are generally a lot lower – and if they have learned your business or acquired your IP in the early stages, may even be negative. (Think of negative opportunity cost as an incentive to move on to the next deal.)</p>
<p>A Chinese negotiator, therefore, has a greater range of motion than his American or European counterparty. This is one of the ways that Chinese negotiators <a href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/05/chinese-tactics-the-balance-of-power/">shift the balance of power</a> very effectively midway through a negotiation. Your assets are sunk and losing value – theirs assets are fluid and growing (now that you’ve taught them a business).</p>
<p><em><strong>What does it take to hold on to a Chinese partner?</strong></em><br />
When structuring deals in China, if you want to hold on to your partner make sure there is a rising payout – and that he can make more working with you than working against you. If you can’t offer those terms, you have to seriously reconsider whether you want an equity or strategic partnership with a mainland Chinese counterparty.</p>
<p>Often the question is a simple one – would you rather own a minority stake in a money machine or a controlling interest in a broken down jalopy?</p>
<p><em><strong><strong>Do it the Disney Way</strong></strong></em><br />
When Disney did their Shanghai deal, they didn’t play cat and mouse with the Chinese authorities. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704630004576249403695469400.html"> Walt Disney Co. handed over about 57% of their cheese to a couple of SOEs representing the Shanghai government</a>.  Sounds like the mouse got trapped &#8212; but you can bet that no one will be selling Disney knock-offs outside the Shanghai subway stations. This is a self-reinforcing deal, because the Chinese partner feels like the brand is working for them. Disney’s apparent weakness – its minority stake – is actually a strength. Shanghai now has something to lose if the partnership goes bad.</p>
<p>The key consideration is that Disney has a unique and highly recognizable brand that their key Chinese market is already clamoring for. If you don’t have that, then you’ll have to make do with money, technology or other assets. Your Chinese partners don’t just want a lot – they don’t just want a growing return. They want more than YOU are getting. For the Chinese side, sometimes one of the deal variables is out-dealing the foreigner – so plan accordingly.</p>
<p><strong><em>But I Don’t Want To Give Up Control</em></strong><br />
If you’ve looked at all the angles and majority control is still your one and only choice, then plan accordingly and prepare for the tough times. That doesn’t mean you should act tough – just the opposite. You have to look patient, while keeping your options open and protecting yourself against an army of counterparties who feel that they have nothing to lose by trying to swipe your technology, business model, key people and markets. Here are a few of other things you have to do:</p>
<ul>
<li>No exclusivity talk. The Chinese will ask for it, and some Americans think they are being clever by playing coy and dangling exclusivity in front of their counterparty’s face like a carrot on a stick. Bad move. You are guaranteeing that you and your non-partner will have a damaging conflict. He may not win, but you’ll certainly lose.</li>
<li>No partners. If you want to play the lone wolf, then be the lone wolf. Assuming that a Chinese partner will be satisfied with a perpetual subordinate role only works if you are A) over-paying, B) working with a stupid partner, or C) all of the above. Build nice, cordial relationships but be clear that you are paying for transactions – not offering an equity stake. If the Chinese side indicates that this isn’t what they are looking for, then for God’s sake, pay attention and move on! Don’t twist their arm into learning your business model and technology when you know they will eventually be dissatisfied.</li>
<li>Have multiple counterparties for key functions and service chains. It’s not efficient, but you don’t go it completely alone in China for efficiency. Always be ready to move on to your next best option. This means that you have to build in plans and budgets for continually expanding your range of connections – and you can’t rely on the network of the people you may be leaving behind. When Partner A helps you hire internal staff and find your service-providers and suppliers, you have a problem dropping him in favor of Partner B – because the first guy now has conduits into your business.</li>
<li>Safeguard your IP. If it’s any good, someone will make a play for it. Protect everything (with your own lawyers – not a partner’s) and only bring in what you can afford to lose. Even if you register and copyright everything, they will still copy and backwards engineer whatever they want to use. It won’t prevent you from using it in China, but you will be competing with your own designs.</li>
<li>You have more to lose than money or technology. Apple is finding itself tied to some very unsavory labor practices, and it can’t disengage even if wants to. It’s brand image is going to be battered, but it has no choice but to stay involved with partners that make it look as evil as any other sweatshop operating, worker-killing, child labor exploiting factory boss.</li>
<li>Be ready to walk away when the time comes. For some westerners, this is the hardest part. If you can’t do it, though, then you will never maintain full control over your own business.</li>
</ul>
<p>===========<br />
<em>Stay Connected to <a href="http://www.chinasolved.com/">ChinaSolved</a> / <a href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/">ChineseNegotiation.com</a>:</em><br />
<!-- Place this tag where you want the +1 button to render --></p>
<p><!-- Place this render call where appropriate --><br />
<script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
   (function() {     var po = document.createElement('script'); po.type = 'text/javascript'; po.async = true;     po.src = 'https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js';     var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s);   })();
// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<div class="fb-like-box" data-href="https://www.facebook.com/pages/ChinaSolved/293904690655157" data-width="292" data-show-faces="false" data-stream="false" data-header="true"></div>
<p><em>ChineseNegotiation.com and ChinaSolved.com invite you to participate the <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups/China-Solved-1392417?gid=1392417&amp;trk=hb_side_g">ChinaSolved linkedin group</a>.</em></p>
<p><em>Twitter: @chinasolved VPN required in China.</em><br />
Email at <a href="http://www.chinasolved.com/chinasolved@gmail.com">chinasolved@gmail.com </a></p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chinesenegotiation.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fwhat-can-you-do-for-me-tomorrow%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2012/01/what-can-you-do-for-me-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US-China Negotiation in 2011 (sung to the tune of Rock the Boat &#8211; Don&#8217;t Rock the Boat, Baby)</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2011/01/us-china-negotiation-in-2011-sung-to-the-tune-of-rock-the-boat-dont-rock-the-boat-baby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2011/01/us-china-negotiation-in-2011-sung-to-the-tune-of-rock-the-boat-dont-rock-the-boat-baby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 03:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hupert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Americans Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Negotiating Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-China negotiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-China relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The future of US-China commerce depends on counter-parties’ ability to manage chaos and change. The same reality will govern individual businesses and industries. When entrenched players begin to lose ground to competitors – or are weakened by environmental factors – the stage is set for disruption and hyper-competition. This is not a scenario that favors soft-landings – or steady recoveries.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When negotiating, do you want to reinforce the status quo or upset the existing order?   It’s not simply a matter of being conservative vs. risk taking – this is a key predictor of your success or failure.   The decision to support or disrupt the status quo is a matter of style, strategy, time horizon and environmental analysis.</p>
<p>Every negotiation presents counter-parties with only 2 possibilities:</p>
<ol> 1.	Support the status quo<br />
2.	Disrupt the status quo.</ol>
<p>Supporters come in 2 varieties.</p>
<ol> 1.	 Monopolists or quasi-monopolists who have the power and/or environmental adaptation to benefit from the situation the way it is.  These negotiators should be either<a title="Shell Matrix in China" href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2008/10/5-chinese-negotiating-styles/"> competitive or avoiding</a>.<br />
2.	Weak players, niche-exploiters, price takers, and those unable to adapt to an adverse environment.   This class of status-quo preserver would say, ‘The devil we know is better than one we don’t’.  These counter-parties are accommodators or compromisers.</ol>
<p>Disrupters are generally pretty similar – they understand that the best way to advance their cause and maximize their interests is to shake things up.  Start-ups, expanders and negotiators who believe they can benefit from shifts to the commercial or regulatory landscape are disrupters.  This type of negotiator is a collaborator or a competitor.  They benefit by breaking the rules or subverting entrenched market leaders.</p>
<p><strong>US, China and the Status Quo</strong><br />
How a negotiator perceives status-quo will tell you a lot about his interests and goals.</p>
<p>Until about 2007, US counter-parties tended to approach US-China negotiation from the perspective that that the status quo was in their favor.  This was part of the DNA of American negotiators – from the boot-strappingest start-up all the way up to the Federal government.   Western strategists in China equated ‘progress &amp; reform’ with ‘doing things the US way’.   Sec of Treasury Geithner&#8217;s exchange-rate negotiating approach is a great example – he seems continual perplexed by China’s inability to conform to ‘business as usual’, and has spent the last 2 years waiting around for Beijing to come to its senses.</p>
<p>Chinese negotiators have their own quirks and biases when it comes to analyzing the status quo.  Beijing orthodoxy is that the 21st century belongs to China, and that the rest of the world will pay any price to participate in the new China-centric economic order.  Beijing seems intent on rolling back the calendar to pre-2006 times when central planning and state control was unchallenged.  Compulsory technology transfers and increasing censorship of the internet indicate how Beijing sees the new world order.</p>
<p><strong>Disruption Happens</strong><br />
The problem is that both sides can’t be right.  If Washington and Beijing both conclude that inertia favors their goals, then the stage is set for a collision of interests.  Ironically, conservative strategies actually lead to a highly unstable situation.</p>
<p>The future of US-China commerce depends on counter-parties’ ability to manage chaos and change.  The same reality will govern individual businesses and industries.  When entrenched players begin to lose ground to competitors – or are weakened by environmental factors – the stage is set for disruption and hyper-competition.   This is not a scenario that favors soft-landings – or steady recoveries.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 90px;"><em>Our love is like a ship on the ocean<br />
We&#8217;ve been sailing with a cargo full of, love and devotion<br />
So I&#8217;d like to know where, you got the notion<br />
Said I&#8217;d like to know where, you got the notion<br />
To rock the boat, don&#8217;t rock the boat, baby<br />
Rock the boat, don&#8217;t tip the boat over<br />
Rock the boat, don&#8217;t rock the boat baby<br />
&#8211;Hues Corporation 1974. </em></p>
<p><strong>Next:  When is it best to Rock the Boat?</strong></p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chinesenegotiation.com%2F2011%2F01%2Fus-china-negotiation-in-2011-sung-to-the-tune-of-rock-the-boat-dont-rock-the-boat-baby%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2011/01/us-china-negotiation-in-2011-sung-to-the-tune-of-rock-the-boat-dont-rock-the-boat-baby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negotiating Chinese Partnerships – Are you a long term partner or a short term resource?</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/07/negotiating-chinese-partnerships-%e2%80%93-are-you-a-long-term-partner-or-a-short-term-resource/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/07/negotiating-chinese-partnerships-%e2%80%93-are-you-a-long-term-partner-or-a-short-term-resource/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hupert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Americans Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Negotiating & Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Negotiating Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Know Your Counter-Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese negotiating behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiating tactic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-China negotiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chinese negotiators often see the foreign partnership as a short-term tactic on the way to the real long-term goal of independent global competitiveness.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Western companies in China feel that the deck is stacked against them.  Between rising labor costs, indigenous innovation requirements and slowing global demand, it has never been harder to make profit on the Mainland.  Even the deep-pocketed China-fans like GE and Siemens are publicly complaining about the operating environment.   The stock answer to China’s business challenges used to be finding a local partner who could open doors and bring a little local love. Unfortunately for newcomers and old-hands alike, Western partners in China JVs &#038; tie-ups are reporting their own tales of woe – from pinched technology to crimped sales.  More and more Chinese firms are telling their Western partners that the marriage is over.</p>
<p><em>Aren’t Chinese businesses supposed to be long term planners?</em></p>
<p>Yes, and that’s the problem.  As many Western deal-makers are finding out, Chinese negotiators often see the foreign partnership as a short-term tactic on the way to the real long-term goal of independent global competitiveness.  </p>
<p>Chinese firms are pragmatic.  They acknowledge the need for Western technology and methodology, but that no longer means a permanent marriage.    Since the financial crisis of 2007, Western firms have lost the brass ring that used to keep the Chinese side of the partnership in line – access to US and European markets.  The cold hard fact is that Western firms are entering partnership negotiations with a hand that is not strong and growing weaker.  The Chinese market is becoming the new El Dorado (though it may end up being just as mythical) and the technology gap is definitely growing narrower.  </p>
<p>Chinese firms are increasingly viewing Western firms as a short-term partner, a medium-term customer or client and a long-term competitor.  Operating a JV in China was tough enough before the crash in the US &#038; Europe and China’s new ‘indigenous innovation’ policy came into force – but many international managers in China now see a bleak future.<br />
Here are a few useful tactics for negotiating a long term relationship in China:</p>
<ol>
<strong>1.	Plan first, negotiate after.</strong><br />
Don’t shy away from asking yourself hard questions about your basic plans for China.  Do you really need a long term partner in China?  Why?  What’s the relative balance of power going to be through the life of your partnership?  Are you looking for a perpetual subordinate – because your Chinese counter-party might not be interested in a permanent secondary role.  As you and he both learn more about the business what’s the natural competitive environment going to evolve into?  Not only do you have to plan for 2015 – you have to discuss those plans with the Chinese side.  If you plan on calling the shots in China ad infinitum, then you would be wise to make that clear BEFORE you share your IP and trade secrets. </p>
<p><strong>2.	Structure is everything in China.</strong><br />
Forget about NDAs and contracts.  The deal that makes sense is the deal you’ll end up with.  If you plan on having a long term relationship, structure accordingly.  If you are providing design and capital and he is providing market entry advice and distribution then you have to plan for a point 18 months from now when he has your designs and you have access to distribution channels.  What are you basing JV 2.0 on?   A Chinese partner who thinks he can do better without you is going to find a way out of the relationship, even if it means scuttling the business and starting over on his own after you have gone back home.  If the only thing you have in your corner is a signed contract, then you are embarking on a lose-lose relationship.  </p>
<p><strong>3.	Consider a sunset clause. </strong><br />
Your best relationship may be a short one with an option for some type of longer-term arrangement.  Teenagers think that passion leads to happy-ever-after, but adults are supposed to know that compatibility is based on other things.  Still &#8211; there’s nothing wrong with a quick hook-up if everyone knows that’s all there is.  But don’t propose if all you want is dinner and a movie.  No matter what your plan, always have a viable exit strategy.</p>
<p><strong>4.	Don’t pay today for what may or may not come tomorrow. </strong><br />
Cynical Chinese negotiators learned long ago that naïve Americans believe in the fantasy of ‘long-term guanxi’ and are more than happy to let you pay up-front for the relationship of your dreams.  Their dream is being the sole patriarch of a family dynasty.  You aren’t in their dream. </p>
<p><strong>5.	Use your words. </strong><br />
If you have thought it through and decided that a long-term relationship is what you want, then make that part of your negotiation from the beginning.  Be explicit and open.  This is exactly the kind of thing you should be talking about during those relationship-building activities &#038; banquets.  Don’t just stop with the easy platitudes about harmony and working together.  Likewise, don’t hold your breath waiting for the Chinese side to come up with a comprehensive game plan.  It’s up to you to come up with specifics that include benchmarks and a structure that keeps both sides satisfied.</ol>
<p>Partnership hint:  Long-term JVs in China are more threatened by success than failure.  It’s relatively easy to pull together when disaster is at hand and everyone needs one another.  It’s when the Chinese side comes to believe (rightly or wrongly) that you have outlived your usefulness that partnerships fall apart.  Plan for the good times as well as the bad.<br />
==============</p>
<p>Stay Connected to ChinaSolved / ChineseNegotiation.com:</p>
<p>ChineseNegotiation.com and ChinaSolved.com invite you to participate the <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1392417">ChinaSolved linkedin group</a>.</p>
<p>ChinaSolved / ChineseNegotiation.com <a href="http://www.chinasolved.com/signup1102.php">mailing list</a></p>
<p><del datetime="2009-08-03T01:20:37+00:00">Follow on twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/chinasolved">@chinasolved</a></del> TWITTER blocked in China</p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chinesenegotiation.com%2F2010%2F07%2Fnegotiating-chinese-partnerships-%25e2%2580%2593-are-you-a-long-term-partner-or-a-short-term-resource%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/07/negotiating-chinese-partnerships-%e2%80%93-are-you-a-long-term-partner-or-a-short-term-resource/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negotiating in China: Countering the BOPS</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/06/negotiating-in-china-countering-the-bops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/06/negotiating-in-china-countering-the-bops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 05:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hupert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Americans Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Know Your Counter-Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BATNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese negotiating behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese negotiating technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-China negotiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’ve looked at the causes of the Balance of Power Shift (BOPS) and how it affects Chinese negotiating tactics. Now we are ready to look at how American negotiators in China can prepare and protect themselves from the fallout of BOPS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chinese-Western negotiations are more fluid than deals in the US.  If you expect your business in China to be stable and predictable once a contract is signed then you are in for some educational times ahead.  Westerners doing business in China <a href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2009/09/what’s-the-hardest-part-of-doing-business-in-china/">report that they have more problems after the contract is signed than before</a>.  Much of this has to do with the BOPS – the Balance of Power Shift that affect most US-Chinese relationships.</p>
<p>We’ve looked at the <a href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/05/chinese-tactics-the-balance-of-power/ ">causes of the BOPS</a> and <a href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/06/us-china-negotiation-tactics-and-the-balance-of-power-shifts-bops-part-ii-how-it-affects-chinese-tactics/">how it affects Chinese negotiating tactics</a>. Now we are ready to look at how American negotiators in China can prepare and protect themselves from the fallout of BOPS.</p>
<ol> <strong>Forewarned is forearmed. </strong><br />
Watch for shifts in behavior, communication style and attitudes.  Remember that even with good Chinese      partnerships, your gain is often perceived as his loss &#8211; and vice versa.  One of the few constants in Chinese      negotiation is that you have to be proactive about managing the      relationship.  Well, it’s time for      Westerners to raise their game a bit.       The days of qualifying as a cross-culture pro by learning to say      ‘ni hao’ and passing business cards with two hands is over.   Building a relationship in China      is a delicate process that will be influenced by external events.  Anything that impacts on the balance of      power of your business will affect the relationship.   Don’t be blindsided by your      counter-party’s negative reaction to your success or progress.</p>
<p><strong> In China honesty tends NOT to be the best policy, but it has its uses.<br />
</strong>Yes, Chinese people tend to be less direct than Americans, but this      doesn’t mean that you are expected to speak in riddles and vague      allusions.  If your counter-party      seems dissatisfied, distant or hostile then you should find a      non-confrontational way to start a dialogue.  Different regions of China      have varying attitudes towards direct confrontation.  You may find that northerners and even      many Beijingers have few reservations about sharing very frank opinions –      particularly if there is booze involved.       Even if you don’t work through every personal or commercial issue,      you will certainly learn a great deal from a serious discussion.  If the main thing you learn is that your      counter-party isn’t being honest or forthcoming, then that’s a great bit      of information to have.</p>
<p><strong> Always      be ready to go it alone.</strong><br />
Many Western counter-parties in China      are more prepared for failure than for success.  Ask yourself a simple question at the      start of your negotiation with a Chinese business person – ‘what if this      is a big win?’  Sure, you may build      a rock-solid joint venture that your grandchildren end up running together      in amiable cooperation – but there are other, more likely,      possibilities.  The fact is that you      and your Chinese counter-party are each on a separate learning curve and      have your agendas.  If you don’t      already have a Plan B that involves you going your separate ways, then you      are putting yourself in a very weak position for no reason.  Your Chinese counter-party certainly has      a wide range of alternatives – and that is one source of his negotiating      power.</p>
<p><strong>Structure      strategic deals with a rising pay-out.</strong><br />
Chinese and Americans view risk and opportunity differently.  For many Westerners, the China      operation is an extension or expansion of a larger business.  We tend to be accretive – building up      and accumulating pieces of the puzzle in an effort to assemble a large,      stable operation.  Modern Chinese,      on the other hand, have grown accustomed to an endless stream of potential      counter-parties coming ‘round the bend and seeking them out.  When you tell a Chinese counter-party that      he can expect a level payout from a stable business, he may very well take      this as a sign that this deal has lost its potential and it’s time for him      to find a more promising project.         Many Westerners sourcing goods in China      are shocked and dismayed that instead of      building guanxi and receiving better terms from long-term suppliers, they      suffer from unpredictable quality problems and cut-throat price pressure.<br />
Chinese negotiators tend to be more sensitive to opportunity cost than      sunk cost and are always looking for a higher return.  It’s precisely this willingness to book      gains and move on that gives Chinese so much leverage in negotiations with      Westerners.</p>
<p><strong> Don’t      rely too much on your Chinese counter-party’s self-interest to preserve      your partnership. </strong><br />
Clever Westerners      used to gloat that they had guaranteed cooperation and compliance from      Chinese partners by structuring a deal that only involved small up-front      good faith payments—with the bulk of the payment coming after the Chinese      side had performed satisfactorily.    This plan usually failed for one of three reasons.<br />
First, this kind of behavior, while      considered prudent in the West, tended to undermine guanxi and led to a      vicious cycle of distrust and suspicion in China.  A second problem stemmed from the fact      that cash was not the only asset involved.       While the Westerner was very withholding and cautious with his      dollars, he tended to be much more generous with his IP – such as designs,      brands, and processes.  Many Chinese      counter-parties considered the up-front money a scholarship to Your      Business University – and these guys take their education VERY      seriously.  And finally, even a      small up-front payment was worth having if the Western side was offering.  We don’t see this as often as we used to      from established players in Beijing      or Shanghai, but if you are      dealing with entrepreneurs or venturing out to the sticks, a small sum can      go a long way.</ol>
<div>
<p>===========<br />
<em>Stay Connected to <a href="http://www.chinasolved.com/">ChinaSolved</a> / <a href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/">ChineseNegotiation.com</a>:</em><br />
<!-- Place this tag where you want the +1 button to render --></p>
<p><!-- Place this render call where appropriate --><br />
<script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
   (function() {     var po = document.createElement('script'); po.type = 'text/javascript'; po.async = true;     po.src = 'https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js';     var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s);   })();
// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<div class="fb-like-box" data-href="https://www.facebook.com/pages/ChinaSolved/293904690655157" data-width="292" data-show-faces="false" data-stream="false" data-header="true"></div>
<p><em>ChineseNegotiation.com and ChinaSolved.com invite you to participate the <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups/China-Solved-1392417?gid=1392417&amp;trk=hb_side_g">ChinaSolved linkedin group</a>.</em></p>
<p><del datetime="2009-08-03T01:20:37+00:00">Follow on twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/chinasolved">@chinasolved</a></del> TWITTER blocked in China<em><br />
<br /> Email at <a href="http://www.chinasolved.com/chinasolved@gmail.com">chinasolved@gmail.com </a></p>
</div>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chinesenegotiation.com%2F2010%2F06%2Fnegotiating-in-china-countering-the-bops%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/06/negotiating-in-china-countering-the-bops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Chinese Negotiator: From Harmony to Our Money (Part 2).  Dealing With It.</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/01/the-new-chinese-negotiator-from-harmony-to-our-money-part-2-dealing-with-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/01/the-new-chinese-negotiator-from-harmony-to-our-money-part-2-dealing-with-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hupert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Americans Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Negotiating Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Know Your Counter-Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business entry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese negotiating behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-China negotiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-China relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/01/the-new-chinese-negotiator-from-harmony-to-our-money-part-2-dealing-with-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dealing with the new Chinese negotiator. If you&#8217;ve been making deals in China for a year or so, you may feel that the mood is getting frosty and a bit tense. Those that have been in the game a little longer should be familiar with the attitude since it is a return to the &#8216;old [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Dealing with the new Chinese negotiator.</em></p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve been making deals in China for a year or so, you may feel that the mood is getting frosty and a bit tense.  Those that have been in the game a little longer should be familiar with the attitude since it is a return to the &#8216;old days&#8217; of the mid-90s when international business in China was more exception than rule.  Beijing was extremely accommodating to both domestic entrepreneurs and foreign friends for most of the last decade, but now the policy people seem to have declared victory and moved on.  </p>
<p>China Inc is maturing and the time has come to put away childish things and start getting down to real business of wielding the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandate_of_Heaven">Mandate of Heaven</a>.   It is time for the foreign friends to either play quietly or go home.</p>
<p>Negotiation in China has always been adversarial – but now at least we can stop pretending in all that &#8216;everybody love everybody&#8217; nonsense.  Here are 10 rules for doing deals in New China.  </p>
<ol>
<p><strong>1. This may not get better soon.  </strong><br />
Cordial relations between China and the West is a fairly recent construct.  Many tried to convince themselves that friendly cooperation &#038; win-win business was the status quo for China deal-making,  but it is simply not historically accurate.  You may want to get along with everyone but US-China rivalry is written in the DNA of both governments.   Look for both sides to slide into old patterns of zero-sum competition.   </p>
<p><strong>2.  Know your counter-party.  </strong><br />
The guy your are dealing with either represents the bureaucracy, an SOE or a private business – but they are all working off the same playbook.  Every local is following both the stated and unstated policy directed by Beijing. This is trickle-down cuthroat competition, and you should beware of ‘good-cop’ partners who offer to manage the pesky bureaucrats for you.  </p>
<p>Most negotiating problems of the past were a result of misunderstanding, incompetence or flat-out dishonesty.  Those are walks in the park compared to ideological disputes.  If you have been working with a local partner, agent or service provider who has been talking up his powerful connections and guanxi with officialdom, you have to understand that those are the relationships he will work to preserve&#8211; not the short-term commercial relationship he has with you.  </p>
<p><strong>3. Every Chinese deal has 2 negotiations.</strong><br />
You negotiate twice in China – once to get the deal and once to do the business.  If you are not budgeting time and resources for the second negotiation, then you are committing a serious tactical blunder.  </p>
<p><strong>4. Double standards and unequal treatment are institutionalized.  </strong><br />
Obama sees Dolly &#8211; and suddenly your regulatory and bureaucratic procedures become more of a hassle.  The rule of law never really caught on in China, and we may have already passed the high-water mark for equitable treatment of WOFEs and FIEs.    Compliance with regulations and loose timetables aren’t just best practice in China anymore – they are immutable laws of nature.  Plan on competing with locals who have much lower hurdles to cross.    </p>
<p><strong>5. Staff up and pay up.</strong><br />
Buy friends to influence people.  That means having a lawyer, an accountant, and access to knowledgeable consultants who are answerable to you and you alone.  I love “Mr. China” type stories about smart guys learning the hard way, but they are anachronisms.  The cost of failure is rising rapidly.  I know that no one likes to pay for professional advice, but the ground is shifting.  Local counter-parties and suppliers are no longer valid sources of information (if they ever were).  Make sure you have access to reliable, timely information.  If that means spending money, time or bandwidth, then budget for it.<br />
Oh yeah &#8212; more bad news.  Paying for expert advice is only the beginning.  Then you have to actually follow it.</p>
<p><strong>6. Lock in gains.</strong><br />
The relationships you have are the relationships you want to keep.  The Chinese are serious about the value of relationships – but that cuts both ways.  Yes, the people you’ve known and worked with for years will be loyal to you (maybe).  Building new relationships, however, will be much harder in this environment.  Vet new partners and suppliers carefully, and make sure that you are worthy of any trust and loyalty you’ve built up with locals over the last few years.  </p>
<p><strong>7. Have a plan B </strong><br />
You need an alternative course of action that doesn’t have the same risk profile as your main game.  That might mean structuring your China operation differently &#8212; or maybe creating a scenario that doesn&#8217;t include China at all.   Ask yourself a simple question – what if you and/or your key people can’t get a visa to enter China?  Is it an inconvenience or a train wreck?  </p>
<p><strong>8. How much China do you want?  </strong><br />
We used to ask, “How much do you need to be in China?”  Now we’ll be asking, “How much China do you need to be in?”  The days of growing an &#8220;organic&#8221; (i.e.: unplanned, seat-of-your-pants) China organization are over.  China is now too expensive, competitive and risky to fly blind.  How much money, personnel and bandwidth do you plan on investing, and what do you plan on getting in return?  If you can’t answer those questions then you haven’t planned enough.</p>
<p><strong>9. Stop reinventing the wheel.</strong><br />
Look for people you know who have already done this (i.e.: other expats) to partner with or hire as management consultants.  An ideal partner is someone with a good reputation, a similar or complementary business, and has been through all the regulatory and licensing procedures.  This can be a great way for newcomers and expanders to get exposure to China without taking on too much risk.</p>
<p><strong>10. You only get to play hardball once in China.  </strong><br />
Chinese negotiators tend to be passive-aggressive and are highly sensitive to perceived slights and insults.  Two Americans can curse each others’ mothers in the heat of negotiations and still end up lifelong buddies and partners.   This isn’t going to happen in China.    If you feel that you have no choice but to issue an ultimatum or lay down the law, make sure it’s worth it.  You may just trash your relationship – even if you were right about the facts.</ol>
<p>China is becoming less cheap, more risky and decidedly less friendly.  That&#8217;s not to say that business can&#8217;t be done or that you can&#8217;t make friends and have a wonderful life in China.  But if the US and China slide into a trade war there is no neutrality.      </p>
<p>===========</p>
<p> <strong><em>Stay Connected to ChinaSolved / ChineseNegotiation.com:</em></strong></p>
<p>ChineseNegotiation.com and ChinaSolved.com invite you to participate the <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1392417	">ChinaSolved linkedin group</a>.</p>
<p>ChinaSolved / ChineseNegotiation.com <a href="http://www.chinasolved.com/signup1102.php">mailing list</a></p>
<p> <del datetime="2009-08-03T01:20:37+00:00">Follow on twitter:  <a href="http://twitter.com/chinasolved">@chinasolved</a></del>  TWITTER blocked in China</p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chinesenegotiation.com%2F2010%2F01%2Fthe-new-chinese-negotiator-from-harmony-to-our-money-part-2-dealing-with-it%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/01/the-new-chinese-negotiator-from-harmony-to-our-money-part-2-dealing-with-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans Negotiating in China  &#8212; Fear the BOPS.</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2009/08/americans-negotiating-in-china-fear-the-bops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2009/08/americans-negotiating-in-china-fear-the-bops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hupert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Americans Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiating in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BATNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiating tactic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-China negotiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2009/08/americans-negotiating-in-china-fear-the-bops/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Balance of Power Shifts. Bops, re-bops – You ain’t gonna like this tune. Business disagreements in China often follow this pattern: You meet a charming, friendly, engaged Chinese business-person, and begin to craft your Win-Win deal. Things progress smoothly through the preliminary phases, and both sides are cooperative and cordial enough to come up with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Balance of Power Shifts. </strong> Bops, re-bops – You ain’t gonna like this tune.  </em> </p>
<p>Business disagreements in China often follow this pattern:  You meet a charming, friendly, engaged Chinese business-person, and begin to craft your Win-Win deal.  Things progress smoothly through the preliminary phases, and both sides are cooperative and cordial enough to come up with a written agreement very quickly.  There seems to be a real bond of trust here.  The American side agrees to transfer funds and technical specifications immediately, and a date is set for the delivery or completion of the project.  This is, in reality, the day that negotiations REALLY begin in earnest – and it’s likely the American will get much less than he bargained for.</p>
<p>This example can be broken down into 3 distinct phases.  </p>
<ol>
<strong>Phase 1.  Courtship.  </strong><br />
The <strong>Balance of Power </strong> (BOP) favors American side.  Chinese side is cordial, flattering, Win-Win, compromising.  American side feels confident, in control, optimistic about expanding business ties in China.  “Why does everyone say this is so hard?”</p>
<p><strong>Phase 2.  Assets transferred.</strong><br />
Moments after the American side transfers an investment, up-front payment, deposit, good-faith money and/or IP &#038; tech specs, the BOP suddenly shifts to the Chinese side.  Their need for the American side has dropped SIGNIFICANTLY now that the money and technology is in China– and the foreigners have already gone back to their oversized American homes and giant gas-guzzling SUVs.   The Chinese side starts dealing with the American side on a more even, informal basis (a good thing) but may become less responsive and communicative (a bad thing).  The American side may not sense that a shift in the power balance has already taken place.  These  relationships are still intact – but will vary in terms of productivity.</p>
<p><strong>Phase 3.  Deal concluded.</strong><br />
The Chinese side has delivered, and the deal is done.  &#8220;Xie Xie ni, wai pengyou – don’t let the door hit your butt.  Here&#8217;s the container, the building, the project &#8212; or the story.  We&#8217;re all done now.&#8221; For many Americans in China, this is when the REAL negotiation begins.  It’s only after the deal is supposed to be completed that the American side finds how little communication/compliance there actually was.  The American side wants to re-engage and persuade the Chinese side to execute the agreement the way they said they would.  But now something strange happens.  The Chinese side may simply ignore their former partners.  This ‘avoider’ strategy is very well respected among China’s commercial set, and if you are unlucky you will find out just how good they can be at it.  The power shift is complete, and you no longer have access to the decision-makers that you need to negotiate a settlement. </ol>
<p><em>Three vital lessons for Americans doing deals in China: </em> </p>
<ol>
1. Watch the timing of the negotiation, because the Chinese side is much, much more patient than you are.</p>
<p>2. Structure your deals so that funding and asset transfers reinforce your position &#8212; not undermine it.</p>
<p>3. Face time is vital.  You have to be in it to win it?  Maybe.  But how about a more China-oriented version:  You have to show up to follow up.  If you &#8211; or someone who represents you (and your counter-party is NOT that guy) isn&#8217;t around to make sure that the spirit of your agreement is respected, then you will certainly end up with less than you thought you bargained for.</ol>
<p> ===========<br />
<em>Stay Connected to <a href="http://www.chinasolved.com/">ChinaSolved</a> / <a href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/">ChineseNegotiation.com</a>:</em><br />
<!-- Place this tag where you want the +1 button to render --></p>
<p><!-- Place this render call where appropriate --><br />
<script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
   (function() {     var po = document.createElement('script'); po.type = 'text/javascript'; po.async = true;     po.src = 'https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js';     var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s);   })();
// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<div class="fb-like-box" data-href="https://www.facebook.com/pages/ChinaSolved/293904690655157" data-width="292" data-show-faces="false" data-stream="false" data-header="true"></div>
<p><em>ChineseNegotiation.com and ChinaSolved.com invite you to participate the <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups/China-Solved-1392417?gid=1392417&amp;trk=hb_side_g">ChinaSolved linkedin group</a>.</em></p>
<p><del datetime="2009-08-03T01:20:37+00:00">Follow on twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/chinasolved">@chinasolved</a></del> TWITTER blocked in China<em><br />
<br /> Email at <a href="http://www.chinasolved.com/chinasolved@gmail.com">chinasolved@gmail.com </a></p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chinesenegotiation.com%2F2009%2F08%2Famericans-negotiating-in-china-fear-the-bops%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2009/08/americans-negotiating-in-china-fear-the-bops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

