<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sub Zero-Sum Game Negotiations in China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/07/sub-zero-sum-game-negotiations-in-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/07/sub-zero-sum-game-negotiations-in-china/</link>
	<description>Negotiate in China more effectively and successfully</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:57:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ???? Jay Abraham ??????????????????</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/07/sub-zero-sum-game-negotiations-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-10563</link>
		<dc:creator>???? Jay Abraham ??????????????????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=644#comment-10563</guid>
		<description>[...] Sub Zero-Sum Game Negotiations in China [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sub Zero-Sum Game Negotiations in China [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ????????????????????????</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/07/sub-zero-sum-game-negotiations-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-10562</link>
		<dc:creator>????????????????????????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=644#comment-10562</guid>
		<description>[...] ?? Andrew Hupert???????????????????????? ?Sub Zero-Sum Game Negotiations in China?? ??????? ????????????????? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ?? Andrew Hupert???????????????????????? ?Sub Zero-Sum Game Negotiations in China?? ??????? ????????????????? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clara Muriel Ruano</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/07/sub-zero-sum-game-negotiations-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-10540</link>
		<dc:creator>Clara Muriel Ruano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=644#comment-10540</guid>
		<description>Really interesting negotiating concept. It would be good to add to the article a lose-lose negotiation case study to illustrate the concept.  
I&#039;ve also had a bit of trouble to understand how the 5 factors (which are good knowledgeable advice) will prevent the &quot;sub-zero&quot; outcome... when the initial assumption is that what they look for is your business loss (even if they need to have a small loss themselves)... 
I understand from the article how those factors will help avoid IP or know-how theft (factor 1),  market access blockage (factor 2) ... but it still sounds like win-lose. ... Factors 3 &amp; 5  will give insights on what to expect about timing ... but I do not see how they prevent the sub-zero outcome...
And I honestly do not agree with point 4. I think companies who are serious about entering the Chinese market value China access as a key part of the deal....and know how difficult it is.... (maybe I misunderstood that one)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting negotiating concept. It would be good to add to the article a lose-lose negotiation case study to illustrate the concept.<br />
I&#8217;ve also had a bit of trouble to understand how the 5 factors (which are good knowledgeable advice) will prevent the &#8220;sub-zero&#8221; outcome&#8230; when the initial assumption is that what they look for is your business loss (even if they need to have a small loss themselves)&#8230;<br />
I understand from the article how those factors will help avoid IP or know-how theft (factor 1),  market access blockage (factor 2) &#8230; but it still sounds like win-lose. &#8230; Factors 3 &amp; 5  will give insights on what to expect about timing &#8230; but I do not see how they prevent the sub-zero outcome&#8230;<br />
And I honestly do not agree with point 4. I think companies who are serious about entering the Chinese market value China access as a key part of the deal&#8230;.and know how difficult it is&#8230;. (maybe I misunderstood that one)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: World Cup afterthought : why China team is not there? &#171; Once in the blue moon</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/07/sub-zero-sum-game-negotiations-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-10412</link>
		<dc:creator>World Cup afterthought : why China team is not there? &#171; Once in the blue moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=644#comment-10412</guid>
		<description>[...] always go with win-win and make the pie bigger (which I totally agree with a great article about zero-sum game negotiations in China that shared by my friend the other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] always go with win-win and make the pie bigger (which I totally agree with a great article about zero-sum game negotiations in China that shared by my friend the other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skyywise</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/07/sub-zero-sum-game-negotiations-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-10408</link>
		<dc:creator>skyywise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=644#comment-10408</guid>
		<description>Is there a term like Distributive or Integrative for these Lose-Lose negotiations?  Such as Destructive or perhaps Vindictive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a term like Distributive or Integrative for these Lose-Lose negotiations?  Such as Destructive or perhaps Vindictive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Sub-zero sum game negotiating in China &#124; Chinese Negotiation -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/07/sub-zero-sum-game-negotiations-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-10403</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Sub-zero sum game negotiating in China &#124; Chinese Negotiation -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=644#comment-10403</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Greg Anderson, ChinaSolved and AndrewShanghai. AndrewShanghai said: ChineseNegotiation Post: Sub zero-sum game negotiation. If you win then they lose... http://ht.ly/29hHt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Greg Anderson, ChinaSolved and AndrewShanghai. AndrewShanghai said: ChineseNegotiation Post: Sub zero-sum game negotiation. If you win then they lose&#8230; <a href="http://ht.ly/29hHt" rel="nofollow">http://ht.ly/29hHt</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

