<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Stakeholder Analysis of Chinese Negotiation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/01/a-stakeholder-analysis-of-chinese-negotiation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/01/a-stakeholder-analysis-of-chinese-negotiation/</link>
	<description>Negotiate in China more effectively and successfully</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:57:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Follow on Twitter:  Chinasolved</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/01/a-stakeholder-analysis-of-chinese-negotiation/comment-page-1/#comment-9974</link>
		<dc:creator>Follow on Twitter:  Chinasolved</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=504#comment-9974</guid>
		<description>Yes, Thom -- I agree.  When I was in business school (quite some time ago) it was all about  the shareholder model.   Stakeholder analysis makes much more sense in a multi-faceted, global world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Thom &#8212; I agree.  When I was in business school (quite some time ago) it was all about  the shareholder model.   Stakeholder analysis makes much more sense in a multi-faceted, global world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/01/a-stakeholder-analysis-of-chinese-negotiation/comment-page-1/#comment-9973</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=504#comment-9973</guid>
		<description>Andrew, thanks for the insightful analysis. What&#039;s interesting is that many of these same insights are universal no matter your location - follow the money may have once worked just fine but stakeholder analysis is far more effective and efficient over the long-term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, thanks for the insightful analysis. What&#8217;s interesting is that many of these same insights are universal no matter your location &#8211; follow the money may have once worked just fine but stakeholder analysis is far more effective and efficient over the long-term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention A Stakeholder Analysis of Chinese Negotiation &#124; Chinese Negotiation -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2010/01/a-stakeholder-analysis-of-chinese-negotiation/comment-page-1/#comment-9972</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention A Stakeholder Analysis of Chinese Negotiation &#124; Chinese Negotiation -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/?p=504#comment-9972</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ChinaSolved, AndrewShanghai and Greg, US-China Forum. US-China Forum said: ChineseNegotiation Post: Stakeholder analysis of Chinese negotiation. http://ow.ly/XZEW [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ChinaSolved, AndrewShanghai and Greg, US-China Forum. US-China Forum said: ChineseNegotiation Post: Stakeholder analysis of Chinese negotiation. <a href="http://ow.ly/XZEW" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/XZEW</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

