<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Negotiating in China: Basics.  BATNA Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2008/12/negotiating-in-china-basics-batna-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2008/12/negotiating-in-china-basics-batna-analysis/</link>
	<description>Negotiate in China more effectively and successfully</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:57:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinese Negotiating Best Practices: The Chinese BATNA &#124; Chinese Negotiation</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2008/12/negotiating-in-china-basics-batna-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-10587</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinese Negotiating Best Practices: The Chinese BATNA &#124; Chinese Negotiation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 03:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesenegotiation.com/?p=138#comment-10587</guid>
		<description>[...] Chinese BATNA:  There’s always another counter-party coming ‘round the bend. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chinese BATNA:  There’s always another counter-party coming ‘round the bend. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When Good Chinese Partnerships Go Bad &#124; Chinese Negotiation</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2008/12/negotiating-in-china-basics-batna-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-10154</link>
		<dc:creator>When Good Chinese Partnerships Go Bad &#124; Chinese Negotiation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesenegotiation.com/?p=138#comment-10154</guid>
		<description>[...] relationship game-changers.  1. Raise your BATNA (Best Alternative to No Agreement, or no-deal option) by upping your skills, knowledge and abilities. 2. Add a new player to the mix. 3. Capitulate. 4. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] relationship game-changers.  1. Raise your BATNA (Best Alternative to No Agreement, or no-deal option) by upping your skills, knowledge and abilities. 2. Add a new player to the mix. 3. Capitulate. 4. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google-China as a case in Lose-Lose Negotiation &#124; Chinese Negotiation</title>
		<link>http://www.chinesenegotiation.com/2008/12/negotiating-in-china-basics-batna-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-9975</link>
		<dc:creator>Google-China as a case in Lose-Lose Negotiation &#124; Chinese Negotiation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinesenegotiation.com/?p=138#comment-9975</guid>
		<description>[...] discovery was a game-changer that significantly constrained Google’s negotiation options. It’s BATNA  plummeted, and the only rational course of action was to negotiate to limit its losses and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discovery was a game-changer that significantly constrained Google’s negotiation options. It’s BATNA  plummeted, and the only rational course of action was to negotiate to limit its losses and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

